<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 PMA Final Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/</link>
	<description>Just another Reviews.photographyreview.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patia</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Patia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 06:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>I finally read this thing. Very educational.

I vote for "Big Bertha."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally read this thing. Very educational.</p>
<p>I vote for &#8220;Big Bertha.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I think I might take out a mortgage on one of those sigma "RPG's". One thing not mentioned here is that they retail for 25k and are made to order.

I hope at that price the shipping is free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I might take out a mortgage on one of those sigma &#8220;RPG&#8217;s&#8221;. One thing not mentioned here is that they retail for 25k and are made to order.</p>
<p>I hope at that price the shipping is free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo-John</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo-John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Max-
Glad you like the photo of the transparent Pentax K20D. Unfortunately, it was only made for marketing purposes. It wouldn't actually work. Light-tightness is just as critical as it ever was for photography. So you won't be seeing a working clear-bodied camera anytime soon :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max-<br />
Glad you like the photo of the transparent Pentax K20D. Unfortunately, it was only made for marketing purposes. It wouldn&#8217;t actually work. Light-tightness is just as critical as it ever was for photography. So you won&#8217;t be seeing a working clear-bodied camera anytime soon <img src='http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Leo</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Ever since I saw, but never used or owned one, a camera flash unit with a clear transparent body casing back in the late '70s/early '80s, I've been waiting for a similar clear &#38; transparent camera body to come along! Especially now when light-tightness isn't as critical as in the good old days of film (maybe I'm wrong here?). Or they can make a lightproof box for the sensor &#38; the rest of the camera body out of tough clear transparent acrylic, etc. It'd be fun to see all the camera body innards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since I saw, but never used or owned one, a camera flash unit with a clear transparent body casing back in the late &#8217;70s/early &#8217;80s, I&#8217;ve been waiting for a similar clear &amp; transparent camera body to come along! Especially now when light-tightness isn&#8217;t as critical as in the good old days of film (maybe I&#8217;m wrong here?). Or they can make a lightproof box for the sensor &amp; the rest of the camera body out of tough clear transparent acrylic, etc. It&#8217;d be fun to see all the camera body innards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo-John</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo-John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Yes - I meant "Rocket Propelled Grenade." Not a gamer so I would never have thought of the other meaning for RPG :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - I meant &#8220;Rocket Propelled Grenade.&#8221; Not a gamer so I would never have thought of the other meaning for RPG <img src='http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>RPG - as in Rocket Propelled Grenade?!
It is a monster, so how about ... The Hulk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RPG - as in Rocket Propelled Grenade?!<br />
It is a monster, so how about &#8230; The Hulk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathiau</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathiau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>I suggest the “RPG,”

i think you mean RBG? really big gun? or BFG - Big F*** Gun? not Roll Playing Game..lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest the “RPG,”</p>
<p>i think you mean RBG? really big gun? or BFG - Big F*** Gun? not Roll Playing Game..lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I KNew Sony was in it for the duration.  Their new 24mp sensor is was more than I hoped for or expected.  I'd settle for something in the 16-18 range for my max.  What, no guesses on the price of such a beauty?  I'm deliberating whether or not on the a700- for the 5fps, but really need the live view, also- which a700 lacks.  As per usual, Sony does their famous job of marketing:  Bringing out scattered models, with scattered features.  Live view with the new a350 and 14mp, but only 2.2 fps!  Go figure!  They already have all the features I Need, but not in the same box.
What do you bet the new SuperCam will be Pro-Priced, as in Canon Mark's or Nikon's D3x, etc?  I see something in the $3500-7000 bank.  But not in my bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I KNew Sony was in it for the duration.  Their new 24mp sensor is was more than I hoped for or expected.  I&#8217;d settle for something in the 16-18 range for my max.  What, no guesses on the price of such a beauty?  I&#8217;m deliberating whether or not on the a700- for the 5fps, but really need the live view, also- which a700 lacks.  As per usual, Sony does their famous job of marketing:  Bringing out scattered models, with scattered features.  Live view with the new a350 and 14mp, but only 2.2 fps!  Go figure!  They already have all the features I Need, but not in the same box.<br />
What do you bet the new SuperCam will be Pro-Priced, as in Canon Mark&#8217;s or Nikon&#8217;s D3x, etc?  I see something in the $3500-7000 bank.  But not in my bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Griffin</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>The Fuji folder is virtually the same as a previous folder (which I owned) that had a vertical 645 format with a 75mm 3.5 lens.

This one appears to have a horizontal viewfinder, so I have to wonder which format it will have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fuji folder is virtually the same as a previous folder (which I owned) that had a vertical 645 format with a 75mm 3.5 lens.</p>
<p>This one appears to have a horizontal viewfinder, so I have to wonder which format it will have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2008 PMA Camera Tradeshow Coverage Wrap-Up</title>
		<link>http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 PMA Camera Tradeshow Coverage Wrap-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.photographyreview.com/pma2008/2008/02/18/2008-pma-final-report/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] 2008 PMA Camera Tradeshow Final Report 2008 PMA Videos 2008 PMA Gallery All 2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage   Share this photography article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008 PMA Camera Tradeshow Final Report 2008 PMA Videos 2008 PMA Gallery All 2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage   Share this photography article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
