October 14th, 2008 by 
patia
Conclusion
The world’s smallest digital SLR does not disappoint. The Olympus E-420 packs professional features and performance into a remarkably small, lightweight and comfortable camera body. It’s obvious that Olympus’s designers thought this one through. The E-420 is well designed and user-friendly; its body is exceptionally comfortable; and the controls, menus and other settings are highly intuitive. It is a pleasure to use.
If I bought this camera, I would probably also buy the Olympus Zuiko 18-180mm lens. A lightweight, user-friendly digital SLR with a diminutive 36-360mm equivalent lens for under $1,000? I have to admit, it’s very tempting.
Who Should Buy It
The E-420 is an excellent choice for:
- Professional photographers who want a compact lightweight backup digital SLR- especially those who are already using Olympus lenses.
- Professionals for whom packing light is a top priority, such as extreme sports and travel photographers. Female pros in particular will appreciate the E-420’s comfortable size and weight.
- Advanced and serious intermediate photographers looking for digital SLR features, performance and image quality in a smaller, moderately priced package.
- Beginning and intermediate photographers who want to get serious about photography and need a camera they can grow into.
- Families with one serious photographer and a spouse or teens who also want to take great pictures without the intimidation of a big SLR.
This camera is not the best choice for:
- Hardcore pros who require the best possible performance, image quality, or a camera body that can stand up to lots of abuse.
- Beginning photographers intimidated by too many options.
- Anyone who just wants a simple, easy, inexpensive point-and-shoot camera.
- end -
Contents of the Olympus E-420 Box
|
 |
Other Resources:
Compare Prices For Olympus E-420 >>
Olympus E-420 User Reviews >>
Write a Olympus E-420 Review >>
Olympus E-420 Camera Specs >>
Olympus E-420 Sample Gallery >>
Olympus Web site >>
Download Olympus E-420 Camera Manual >>
All Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Digital Camera Buyer’s Guide >>
All Digital Camera Sample Images >>
All photos copyright Patia Stephens and/or PhotographyREVIEW.com.
Read Patia’s blog and see more of her photos at www.PatiaStephens.com
October 15th, 2008 at 7:42 am
[...] Olympus E-420 Final Pro Review [...]
October 15th, 2008 at 11:43 am
Great pro review, like most of them are.
The E-420 does feel good in the hand for me too, I tried it out at a photo store. However, the lack of in-body image stabilization and no Olympus lenses available with a stabilizer prevents me from running out and buying this camera.
Other than this, it seems to be feature-packed and high-quality. Live view in such a tiny D-SLR would also be sure to come in handy.
October 15th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Thank you very much for the kind words and sharing your thoughts. I confess I’m sad to have to send this camera back!
October 26th, 2008 at 4:41 am
I had the e420 with twin kits lens and its much way better then my FZ7 Lumix… The cheapest level entry DSLR in Malaysia compared to Canon/Nikon. (with the twin kits lens). As a DSLR beginners its pretty worthwhile. Throw in the pancakes 25mm + FL36.. I save a lot just to fulfill my hobby
Cheers…
November 5th, 2008 at 8:16 pm
Very interesting comment nafim!!!
I also own an FZ7K.
November 6th, 2008 at 10:46 am
nafim and A.M.D.A. -
Bigger pixels are always better! The E-420 will be faster and have much better image quality than the Panasonic FZ7 or any other compact digital camera. What it’s missing is the long zoom and image stabilization. For those you’ll need an Olympus E-520 and the Olympus Zuiko 18-200mm or 70-300mm lens. That combination will stomp the FZ7 in every possible way.
November 21st, 2008 at 11:25 am
John -
Of course I know that any DSLR will provide better image quality and features than compact digital cameras.
What I meant is that it was interesting to read someone else’s opinion comparing the E-420 with the FZ7. As you know, the menu layouts/buttons as well as the Oly’s design and feel are quite different than the Lumix.
Right now I can’t afford to buy a DSLR, but it sure is interesting to read other people’s opinions, since eventually I will have to make an upgrade. Thanks for the suggestion on the E-520, that looks like a better option, since it has a built-in stabilizer.
November 26th, 2008 at 9:06 am
Thanks for great reviews! I am int process to make may final choice, the e-420 or the e-520. My major concer is: what practical impact has the absence of a stabilizer of lences or body to my work. In which situations will I feel I should hae given priority over whiegt and size over IS-functions? Very few, if any, give answers to this issue.
December 8th, 2008 at 10:31 pm
soy una vara caliente y ya tengo una de estas…
December 9th, 2008 at 10:30 pm
Que?
June 7th, 2009 at 11:36 am
do nto buy the 18-180 olympus lens john. its slow and very soft. I was disappointed and took it back.
June 9th, 2009 at 10:43 pm
Thanks for your comment, Steph. I’ve had the opportunity to use the Olympus 18-180mm lens and I agree that it’s not one of Olympus’ better lenses. For some people it might be a good option, though. Please post a review for the lens, since you’ve used it. We need more Olympus camera and lens reviews. Here’s a link to the Olympus 18-180mm lens user review page:
Olympus Zuiko Digital 18-180mm Lens User Reviews >>
Personally, I’d rather carry a couple of lenses and know I’m going to have better quality. Usually, I carry the 12-60mm and the 70-300mm. That offers very good quality and a huge range.